The Centrality of Central Asia

André Gunder Frank

Studies in History · 1992 · 110 citations · 22 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Historical studies often challenge prevailing wisdom and reframe long‑standing issues. The paper opens a dialogue by invoking Andre Gunder Frank’s claim that Central Asian history is key to understanding global developments. Four scholars—Balland, Barfield, Haider, and Krader—critique Frank’s thesis from a world‑system perspective, each bringing expertise in geography, China‑Central Asia relations, medieval sources, and Marxist theory. Frank’s rejoinder ultimately encapsulates the debate, at least for the present.

Abstract

From time to time Studies in History will carry a contribution challenging received wisdoms or turning long-standing issues on their head. Our first dialogue is initiated by Andre Gunder Frank who argues that the history of Central Asia is crucial to the understanding of developments in a very large part of the world. Four scholars of Central Asia then comment on this provocative thesis from an unabashed non-specialist, anchored in world-system theory. Daniel Balland comments as a geographer of the region, Thomas Barfield as an expert on China-Central Asia connexions. Mansura Haider specializes on medieval Central Asia and has a command over the Uzbeg and Persian language sources, and Lawrence Krader, known in India primarily as a Marxist theoretician, is an authority on political processes amongst Central Asian peoples. Frank's rejoinder sums up the debate—for the moment!

References

22