Scientia Marina · 2012 · 15 citations · 18 references
Life SciencesBiologyZoologyInsect SystematicsInvertebrate ZoologySystematicsDiagnostic MorphologyExternal MorphologyMorphological SystematicsSpecies DescriptionBranching Pattern FormationDiagnostic Morphological CharactersDichotomous BranchingGenus DescriptionMorphological SynapomorphiesScales MorphologySclerite MorphologySpecies Diagnostic Morphology
The taxonomy of the primnoid genus Amphilaphis Studer and Wright in Studer, 1887 has been in a confused state for a long time and a revision of the species included in that genus has become a necessity. We have revised and redescribed the species previously included in the genus using up-to-date technology, such as polyp and sclerite images obtained with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As a result of this study, because the type species of Amphilaphis is actually a Thouarella species, we consider the genus Amphilaphis to be no longer valid. One of the species previously considered in Amphilaphis has a set of morphological characters that are not recognizable in any of the current primnoid genera. Primnocapsa n. gen. has a dichotomous branching pattern, polyps placed singly, in spirals around the branchlets, 8 opercular scales with the inner surface keeled and with 2 mounds basally and 8 marginal scales offset from the operculars. The new genus is described and illustrated. Moreover, one of the re-examined species has been included in a new subgenus, Faxiella n. subgen. of Plumarella Gray, 1870 because it has polyps placed in pairs. Finally, the remaining re-examined species have been included in the genus Thouarella Gray, 1870, one of the most specious primnoid genera.
18
Marine centres of origin as evolutionary engines
John C. Briggs · Journal of Biogeography · 2003 · 327 citations