Journal of Neuroscience · 2011 · 32 citations · 51 references
MedicineNeurosciencePharmacologyBehavioral NeuroscienceNeuropharmacologyPsychopharmacologyCannabinoid PharmacologyNeuromodulationNeurotransmissionOperant ConditioningReward PathwaysReward ProcessingBrain Reward CircuitryCannabinoid Receptor ModulationCannabinoid Receptor PharmacologyElectrical StimulationOpportunity Cost ValuationReward Circuit FunctionReward Circuit Modulation
CB1 receptor blockade is known to reduce reward seeking, yet its impact on performance for rewarding electrical brain stimulation has been inconsistently reported, likely because reward pursuit depends on reward intensity, cost, competing rewards, and the sensitivity of brain reward circuitry. The study aimed to show that the CB1 antagonist AM‑251 decreases performance for rewarding medial forebrain bundle stimulation in rats and to identify the remaining determinants of performance responsible for this effect. Using a novel conceptual framework and microdialysis, the authors demonstrated that AM‑251 attenuates nucleus accumbens dopamine release during stimulation, linking CB1 blockade to reduced reward‑seeking performance. The results indicate that AM‑251’s suppressive effect is not due to changes in sensitivity, but rather to reduced dopamine release, and explain prior inconsistencies as arising from averaging heterogeneous data and inadequate methods.
There is ample evidence that blockade of CB(1) receptors reduces reward seeking. However, the reported effects of CB(1) blockade on performance for rewarding electrical brain stimulation stand out as an exception. By applying a novel method for conceptualizing and measuring reward seeking, we show that AM-251, a CB(1) receptor antagonist, does indeed decrease performance for rewarding electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in rats. Reward seeking depends on multiple sets of variables, including the intensity of the reward, its cost, and the value of competing rewards. In turn, reward intensity depends both on the sensitivity and gain of brain reward circuitry. We show that drug-induced changes in sensitivity cannot account for the suppressive effect of AM-251 on reward seeking. Therefore, the role of CB(1) receptors must be sought among the remaining determinants of performance. Our analysis provides an explanation of the inconsistencies between prior reports, which likely arose from the following: (1) the averaging of data across subjects showing heterogeneous effects and (2) the use of methods that cannot distinguish between the different determinants of reward pursuit. By means of microdialysis, we demonstrate that blockade of CB(1) receptors attenuates nucleus accumbens dopamine release in response to rewarding medial forebrain bundle stimulation, and we propose that this action is responsible for the ability of the drug to decrease performance for the electrical reward.
51
An Introduction to the Bootstrap.
S. T. Buckland, B. Efron, Ryan J. Tibshirani · Biometrics · 1994 · 3.2K citations
ON THE LAW OF EFFECT<sup>1</sup>
R. J. Herrnstein · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · 1970 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Progressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength
William Hodos · Science · 1961 · 1.1K citations