Comparison of the Accu-Chek Aviva Point-of-Care Glucometer with Blood Gas and Laboratory Methods of Analysis of Glucose Measurement in Equine Emergency Patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More information is needed regarding accuracy of commonly used methods of glucose measurement in the critically ill horse. HYPOTHESIS: Glucometry will have good agreement with a laboratory standard. Glucometry with plasma will have better agreement than when performed with whole blood. ANIMALS: Fifty sequentially admitted equine emergency patients, aged >1year. METHODS: Venous blood was collected at admission and immediately analyzed by point-of-care glucometry on both whole blood (POC/WB) and plasma (POC/PL), a multielectrode blood gas analyzer with whole blood (BLG), and a standard laboratory method with plasma (CHEM). Paired data were compared using Lin's concordance correlation, Pearson's correlation, and robust regression. Bias and limits of agreement were tested by the Bland-Altman technique. Bivariate regression analysis was used to explore confounding factors. RESULTS: Concordance was significant for all comparisons, and was strongest for CHEM-POC/PL (0.977) and weakest for POC/WB-POC/PL (0.668). Pearson's correlation was excellent for all comparisons except those with POC/WB. All comparisons had excellent robust regression coefficients except those with POC/WB. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: POC glucometry with plasma had excellent agreement with a laboratory standard, as did blood gas analysis. POC glucometry with whole blood correlated poorly with a laboratory standard. These differences may be clinically important, and could affect decisions based on glucose concentrations.