Blowing the Whistle Against Greek Hazing: The Theory of Reasoned Action as a Framework for Reporting Intentions

Abstract

This study tests the applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) framework to whistle-blowing intentions within the context of Greek hazing. Participants (N = 259) responded to a survey with one of three scenarios, varying in level of severity ("not severe," "moderately severe," "most severe"), describing a hypothetical hazing situation occurring in their fraternity or sorority. Results show that TRA provides a sound framework for predicting whistle-blowing intentions. Level of severity served as a moderator for behavioral intentions. The TRA model was confirmed for both the "moderately severe" and the "most severe" scenarios. For the "not severe" scenario, the TRA model was supported except for the effect of the product term of behavioral beliefs and outcome evaluations on attitude toward the behavior. The article concludes with a discussion of limitations and theoretical and practical implications.