Publication | Closed Access
Moral Reasoning, Interpersonal Skills, and Cognition of Rapists, Child Molesters, and Incest Offenders
48
Citations
23
References
2000
Year
Forensic PsychologyMoral ReasoningMoral IssuePsychologySocial SciencesPersonality DisorderPublic HealthIncest OffendersBehavioral SciencesChild MolestersPopulation YouthMoral DevelopmentPsychiatryIndex OffenseForensic PsychiatryOffender ClassificationMoral PsychologyInterpersonal ValuesAggressionPsychopathologyCriminal Behavior
54 inmates were subdivided into four groups and classified according to their index offense. The groups included Rapists (n = 14), Incest Offenders (n = 9), Child Molesters (n = 11), General Offenders (n = 20). Nonoffenders (n = 20) were included as a control group. Psychometric tests including the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, the Defining Issues Test, Survey of Interpersonal Values, Porteus Maze, and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory were administered to all inmate and control groups. Analysis showed the rapists and child molesters scored higher on moral reasoning on the Defining Issues Test; also rapists' scores were more elevated on the Psychopathic Deviate and Paranoia scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory than those of other offender and control groups. These results imply that rapists and child molesters have the ability to understand moral issues; however, given their personality orientation, they ignore these interpersonal social values.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1