Publication | Closed Access
Development of Laboratory-Scale Gel Propulsion Technology
62
Citations
27
References
2004
Year
EngineeringMono-methyl Hydrazine/irfna BipropellantsMechanical EngineeringFuel ScienceCombustion EngineeringBiofabricationSol-gel SynthesisChemical EngineeringFluid PropertiesRheologyPolymer ChemistryMaterials ScienceChemical PropulsionGel PropellantsGelled Bipropellant CombinationsPropulsionBiopolymer GelCombustion SciencePolymer ScienceAerospace Propulsion
Selected gel propellants and simulants were formulated, prepared, rheologically characterized, and tested in the first phase of a program to develop gel-propulsion technology infrastructure. Hydrazine-based fuels, gelled with polysaccharides, were characterized as shear-thinning pseudoplastic fluids with low-shear yield stress (τ y i e l d ), whereas inhibited red-fuming nitric acid (IRFNA) and hydrogen peroxide oxidizers, gelled with silica, were characterized as yield thixotropic fluids with significant τ y i e l d . Safe storage and handling procedures were established. A laboratory-scale experimental setup was used to hot fire successfully a small 100-N nominal thrust rocket engine with selected hypergolic neat-liquid and gelled bipropellant combinations. One-element pentad-type injectors were utilized in the tests to inject the propellants into the combustion chamber. Continuous tests of up to 25-s firing duration and multipulse operations of up to 20 cycles of 0.1-s on/0.5-s off were successfully conducted with gelled-hydrazine/IRFNA bipropellants. Neat-liquid and gelled mono-methyl hydrazine/IRFNA bipropellants were also tested. The combustion pressure ranged between 20 and 35 bars. Experimental characteristic velocity, c* e x p , was determined as a function of the oxidizer-to-fuel (O/F) mass flow rate ratio. Maximum c* efficiency of more than 95 and about 90% was obtained in continuous firings for the neat-liquid and gelled hydrazine/IRFNA, respectively. In both cases, the maximum c* e x p values were obtained at higher O/F ratios than those that yield maximum theoretical c*.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1