Publication | Open Access
Effective/census population size ratio estimation: a compendium and appraisal
380
Citations
68
References
2012
Year
Genetic estimation of effective population size (Ne) has proliferated in the conservation and management of endangered or exploited species. The study examined how frequently and accurately studies link Ne to census size N, how uncertainty is accounted for in Ne/N ratios, and how estimation errors affect these ratios. The authors conducted a comprehensive review of empirical literature from the past two decades to address these questions. Only 20 % of studies linked Ne to N, and of those only 31 % did so correctly; just 7 % reported confidence intervals for both Ne and N, with uncertainty often spanning two orders of magnitude, indicating that Ne/N ratio estimation could be substantially improved.
Abstract With an ecological‐evolutionary perspective increasingly applied toward the conservation and management of endangered or exploited species, the genetic estimation of effective population size ( N e ) has proliferated. Based on a comprehensive analysis of empirical literature from the past two decades, we asked: (i) how often do studies link N e to the adult census population size ( N )? (ii) To what extent is N e correctly linked to N ? (iii) How readily is uncertainty accounted for in both N e and N when quantifying N e / N ratios? and (iv) how frequently and to what degree might errors in the estimation of N e or N affect inferences of N e / N ratios? We found that only 20% of available N e estimates (508 of 2617; 233 studies) explicitly attempted to link N e and N ; of these, only 31% (160 of 508) correctly linked N e and N . Moreover, only 7% (41 of 508) of N e / N ratios (correctly linked or not) reported confidence intervals for both N e and N ; for those cases where confidence intervals were reported for N e only, 31% of N e / N ratios overlapped with 1, of which more than half also reached below N e / N = 0.01. Uncertainty in N e /N ratios thus sometimes spanned at least two orders of magnitude. We conclude that the estimation of N e / N ratios in natural populations could be significantly improved, discuss several options for doing so, and briefly outline some future research directions.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1