Researching Electronic Networks

Janet Carey Eldred, Gail E. Hawisher

Written Communication · 1995 · 38 citations · 34 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Composition studies has traditionally relied on theoretical constructs and empirical methods from other disciplines, and recent work on writing and electronic networks has drawn from early CMC studies in social psychology whose premises conflict with current thinking, prompting a shift from positivistic frameworks toward social constructionism. The article reviews interdisciplinary work in composition and computer‑mediated communication, specifically examining four social psychological research groups studying CMC. The authors conduct a review of these four social psychological research groups investigating CMC. The review traces a shift from positivistic to social constructionist frameworks and advocates a dialogic relationship between computer research, composition studies, and social psychology.

Abstract

Composition studies, as a field, has always depended on theoretical constructs and empirical methods from other disciplines. This article looks at interdisciplinary work in the area of composition and computer-mediated communication (CMC). The work on writing and electronic networks has drawn from early experimental studies of CMC in social psychology, the premises of which are at odds with current thinking in both composition studies and social psychology. In recent years, social psychological research on CMC has witnessed changes similar to those in composition: a rethinking of positivistic frameworks and a move to emphasize social constructs. This article reviews the work of four groups conducting social psychological research on CMC. It traces the movement away from theoretical frameworks based in positivism toward those grounded in social constructionism. It concludes by advocating a dialogic relationship between research in computers and composition studies and social psychology.

References

34