Concepedia

The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers

Frank C. Day, David L. Schriger, Christopher J. Todd, Robert L. Wears

Annals of Emergency Medicine · 2002 · 33 citations · 7 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

References

7

Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at <i>Annals of Internal Medicine</i>

Steven N. Goodman · Annals of Internal Medicine · 1994 · 325 citations

, , +14

Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?

Peter M. Rothwell · Brain · 2000 · 250 citations · Full text

, , +12

Instruments for Assessing the Quality of Drug Studies Published in the Medical Literature

Mildred K. Cho · JAMA · 1994 · 179 citations

, , +12

An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal

Martin J. Gardner · JAMA · 1990 · 130 citations

, , +9

Do Readers and Peer Reviewers Agree on Manuscript Quality?

Amy C. Justice · JAMA · 1994 · 43 citations

, , +12