BMC Bioinformatics · 2009 · 168 citations · 17 references
Life SciencesEvolutionary BiologyGeneticsEvolutionary GenomicsGenomicsStatistical GeneticsGenetic Diversity AssessmentVariant AnalysisVariant DetectionAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism MarkersBiasesBin OptimizationDiscriminatory Power AssessmentHomoplasyHomoplasy AnalysisPolymorphism Information Content
BACKGROUND: Since the transfer and application of modern sequencing technologies to the analysis of amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP), evolutionary biologists have included an increasing number of samples and markers in their studies. Although justified in this context, the use of automated scoring procedures may result in technical biases that weaken the power and reliability of further analyses. RESULTS: Using a new scoring algorithm, RawGeno, we show that scoring errors--in particular "bin oversplitting" (i.e. when variant sizes of the same AFLP marker are not considered as homologous) and "technical homoplasy" (i.e. when two AFLP markers that differ slightly in size are mistakenly considered as being homologous)--induce a loss of discriminatory power, decrease the robustness of results and, in extreme cases, introduce erroneous information in genetic structure analyses. In the present study, we evaluate several descriptive statistics that can be used to optimize the scoring of the AFLP analysis, and we describe a new statistic, the information content per bin (Ibin) that represents a valuable estimator during the optimization process. This statistic can be computed at any stage of the AFLP analysis without requiring the inclusion of replicated samples. Finally, we show that downstream analyses are not equally sensitive to scoring errors. Indeed, although a reasonable amount of flexibility is allowed during the optimization of the scoring procedure without causing considerable changes in the detection of genetic structure patterns, notable discrepancies are observed when estimating genetic diversities from differently scored datasets. CONCLUSION: Our algorithm appears to perform as well as a commercial program in automating AFLP scoring, at least in the context of population genetics or phylogeographic studies. To our knowledge, RawGeno is the only freely available public-domain software for fully automated AFLP scoring, from electropherogram files to user-defined working binary matrices. RawGeno was implemented in an R CRAN package (with an user-friendly GUI) and can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/rawgeno.
17
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers
John G. Williams, Anne R. Kubelik, Kenneth J. Livak et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 1990 · 13.2K citations · Full text
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Pieter Vos, René C. J. Hogers, Marjo Bleeker et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 1995 · 12.4K citations · Full text
Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
David Botstein, R. White, Mark H. Skolnick et al. · PubMed · 1980 · 8.4K citations
How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies
Aurélie Bonin, Eva Bellemain, Pernille Bronken Eidesen et al. · Molecular Ecology · 2004 · 1.4K citations