Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach

TLDR

Built‑environment research encompasses cognitive, affective, and behavioural components, yet most studies rely on either strong qualitative or quantitative methods, and a single methodology is argued to miss key aspects. The study aims to discuss philosophical issues in built‑environment research, outlining the debate over quantitative versus qualitative methods and arguing that a single approach is insufficient. The authors review available research paradigms and propose strategies for researchers to choose an informed, sensible methodological path. They recommend a mixed‑methods approach to overcome the limitations of single‑method studies and enhance built‑environment research.

Abstract

Built environment research consists of cognitive and affective, as well as behavioural, components. Existing built environment research utilises either strong qualitative or, more often, strong quantitative methodologies. Aims to discuss some of the philosophical issues that would be considered when undertaking academic research into the built environment. Considers the available research options or paradigms and suggests ways in which a researcher can make an informed and sensible decision as to how to proceed. The main dimensions of the debate about the relative characteristics and merits of quantitative and qualitative methodology are outlined, developing the argument that the use of a single methodology often fails to explore all of these components. The use of a mixed methods approach is suggested to counteract this weakness and to enhance research into the built environment.