The Astrophysical Journal · 2009 · 466 citations · 16 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrometryAstrophysicsObservational AstronomyAstrometric Error AnalysisBlack HolesMassive StarsMilky Way StructureAstrometric Error BudgetBinary Star AstrometryBlack Hole Mass EstimationCombined Astrometric OrbitsOrbit Determination ErrorsSystematic Error CalibrationSystematic Error CorrectionSystematic Errors
Two recent papers (Ghez et al. 2008, Gillessen et al. 2009) have estimated the mass of and the distance to the massive black hole in the center of the Milky Way using stellar orbits. The two astrometric data sets are independent and yielded consistent results, even though the measured positions do not match when simply overplotting the two sets. In this letter we show that the two sets can be brought to excellent agreement with each other when allowing for a small offset in the definition of the reference frame of the two data sets. The required offsets in the coordinates and velocities of the origin of the reference frames are consistent with the uncertainties given in Ghez et al. (2008). The so combined data set allows for a moderate improvement of the statistical errors of mass of and distance to Sgr A*, but the overall accuracies of these numbers are dominated by systematic errors and the long-term calibration of the reference frame. We obtain R0 = 8.28 +- 0.15(stat) +- 0.29(sys) kpc and M(MBH) = 4.30 +- 0.20(stat) +- 0.30(sys) x 10^6 Msun as best estimates from a multi-star fit.
16
MONITORING STELLAR ORBITS AROUND THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE IN THE GALACTIC CENTER
S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, Sascha Trippe et al. · The Astrophysical Journal · 2009 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17
A star in a 15.2-year orbit around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way
R. Schödel, Thomas Ott, R. Genzel et al. · Nature · 2002 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +16