Argument moves in a rule-guided domain

Abstract

We discuss a theoqy of heurtitic strategies and tactics for making arguments in a domain guided by rules where the primary task is to use previous cases to argue for a particular interpretation of a rule in a new fact situation. Since rules frequently have various problematic aspects, such as unstated exceptions or prerequisites, or use terms that are not clearly defined, the actual interpretation is a matter of debate, and the arguer must use interpretations from precedent cases to form his argument.