Functional antagonism between activin and osteogenic protein-1 in human embryonal carcinoma cells

Ester Piek, Mozhgan Afrakhte, Kuber T. Sampath, E J van Zoelen, Carl‐Henrik Heldin, Peter ten Dijke

Journal of Cellular Physiology · 1999 · 44 citations · 55 references

Concepts

Abstract

Activin A and osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) exerted antagonistic effects on each other's responses on the human Tera-2 embryonal carcinoma cell line. OP-1 dose dependently inhibited activin A-induced activation of p3TP-Lux transcriptional reporter, containing part of the human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) promoter, while activin A inhibited OP-1-mediated alkaline phosphatase induction. Approximately equimolar concentrations of both growth factors resulted in 50% inhibition of the respective biological responses. Affinity cross-linking studies using 125I-activin A or 125I-OP-1 followed by receptor-immunoprecipitations revealed that both ligands bound to the activin type II receptor (ActR-II), but recruited different type I receptors. In addition, OP-1 competed with binding of 125I-activin A, and activin A competed with binding of 125I-OP-1 to ActR-II. Transient transfection studies showed that competition between activin A and OP-1 also occurred at the type I receptor (ActR-1) level; constitutively active (CA)-ActR-I inhibited CA-ActR-IB-mediated p3TP-Lux reporter induction. There was no competition between activin A and OP-1 for availability of Smad4, indicating that the concentration of this common signal transducer is not limiting for generating the observed biological responses. Overexpression of ActR-II abolished the inhibitory effect of OP-1 on activin A-induced p3TP-Lux activation and, surprisingly, led to OP-1-induced transcriptional reporter activity. Whereas the exact mechanism of competition is unclear, the role of ActR-II in the competition between activin A and OP-1 is discussed in light of the observed interference in downstream signaling by CA-ActR-I and CA-ActR-IB.

References

55