Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1997 · 320 citations · 70 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyExperimental PsychologyIndividual DifferencesPersonality PsychologyPersonality TraitsTrait StructureTrait TheoryBehavioral PsychologyCorrelational HypothesesUnification
Psychology faces a threat to its scientific status due to a lack of paradigms and the fragmentation of its fields, particularly in personality research. The study demonstrates that integrating experimental and correlational methods can generate new paradigms in personality and intelligence research. This integration is achieved by combining methods and theories from both disciplines to create paradigms that would otherwise be impossible.
It is suggested that the scientific status of psychology is put in danger by the lack of paradigms in many of its fields, and by the failure to achieve unification, psychology is breaking up into many different disciplines. One important cause was suggested by Lee Cronbach in his 1957 presidential address to the American Psychological Association: the continuing failure of the two scientific disciplines of psychology-the experimental and the correlational-to come together and mutually support each other. Personality study in particular has suffered from this disunity, and the debates about the number of major dimensions of personality illustrate the absurdity of the situation. Examples are given to show that by combining methods and theories typical of these two disciplines, one can put forward paradigms that would be impossible without such unification. Such a paradigm is suggested for personality and intelligence.
70
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model
John M. Digman · Annual Review of Psychology · 1990 · 6.5K citations