Lithiated amidines: syntheses and structural characterisations

James Barker, Donald Barr, Nicholas D. R. Barnett, W. Clegg, Ian Cragg‐Hine, Matthew G. Davidson, Robert P. Davies, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson, Judith A. K. Howard, Melvyn Kilner,

Journal of the Chemical Society Dalton Transactions · 1997 · 36 citations · 5 references

Concepts

Abstract

The reaction of a toluene solution of PhNC(Ph)NHPh (N,N′-diphenylbenzamidine) with n-butyllithium gave the toluene-solvated amidinolithium compound {Li[PhNC(Ph)NPh]} n 1. Similarly the same reaction performed in the presence of the Lewis-base donors (Me 2 N) 3 PO (hmpa), Me 2 N(CH 2 ) 2 NMe 2 (tmen) or [Me 2 N(CH 2 ) 2 ] 2 NMe (pmdien) yielded the amidinolithium complexes {Li[PhNC(Ph)NPh·hmpa]} 2 2, {Li[PhNC(Ph)NPh]·tmen} 3 and {Li[PhNC(Ph)NPh]·pmdien} 4 respectively. In addition the reaction of a toluene solution of the related amidine PhNC(Me)NHPh (N,N′-diphenylacetamidine) with LiBu n in the presence of hmpa afforded {Li[PhNC(Me)NPh]·hmpa} 2 5. The solid-state structures of 2–5, which have been resolved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods, show both similarities and differences. The complexes 3 and 4, which contain the di- and tri-dentate ligands tmen and pmdien respectively, are monomeric, whilst use of the unidentate Lewis base hmpa results in dimers 2 and 5. However, the way in which dimerisation is achieved differs. The co-ordination geometry about the lithium cation is clearly influenced by the choice of donor and as such shows how a change in the denticity of the donor ligand utilised can have a significant effect on the solid-state structure of the system.

References

5