Journal of democracy · 2015 · 25 citations · 2 references
Social SciencesInternational RelationsPolitical ScienceDemocratizationIslamic StudiesMiddle Eastern StudiesAuthoritarianismIslamic HistoryMiddle Eastern Conflict StudiesMiddle Eastern Political HistoryMiddle Eastern PoliticsMiddle Eastern SocietiesActorsArab RelationsAuthoritarianism CritiqueAutocratic InstitutionsCivil Society TheoryMiddle East PolicyPolitical PluralismPolitical Quietism
Abstract: Since the 2011 Arab uprisings, Saudi Arabia’s foreign policy in the Middle East has been nonideological, realist, and defensive in intent, but negative in its implications for democracy. To contain Iran, quarantine the Muslim Brotherhood, and combat jihadism, Riyadh has backed local actors that are mostly authoritarian and antiliberal—and the net effect has been damaging for political pluralism and civil society. While the succession to King Salman has produced a more temperate approach to the Brotherhood, such shifts are ultimately tactical. At its core the Kingdom remains an autocratic state wedded to monarchical privilege at home and bent on enforcing political quietism abroad.
2