Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting · 2001 · 159 citations · 0 references
BusinessAccountancyAccountingCorporate DisclosureCorporate ReportingFinancial AccountingCorporate CommunicationCorporate TransparencyDisclosureDisclosure TheoryFinancial ReportingFinancial StatementsCommunication Media ChoiceCorporate Disclosure QualityCorporate Financial DisclosureFinancial Reporting CommunicationTransparency In Corporate Reporting
The recent economic turmoil in Asia has heightened recognition of the importance of corporate transparency and disclosures in financial dealings. The study aims to provide up‑to‑date evidence on current corporate disclosure practices and perceived effectiveness in Hong Kong, and to assess the perceived need for stronger financial reporting regulations and alternative measures to improve market functioning. The authors compared CFO and analyst perceptions on information flow, disclosure, and market efficiency, and examined the perceived need for stronger reporting regulations and alternative improvements. Both CFOs and analysts agreed that most firms use a conservative one‑way disclosure strategy and that a communication gap exists, but analysts demanded stronger regulations more than CFOs; neither group believed that stricter disclosure alone would close the gap, instead calling for higher quality communication, proactive strategies, better investor relations, and voluntary reporting of user‑desired information.
The recent economic turmoil in Asia has led to a wider recognition of the importance of corporate transparency and disclosures in financial dealings. The objective of this study is to provide comprehensive and up‐to‐date evidence of current practice and perceived effectiveness of corporate disclosure of listed companies in an emerging economy—Hong Kong. The study compares the perceptions of chief financial officers (CFOs) and financial analysts about a variety of information flow, disclosure and capital market efficiency issues. It also seeks to determine whether there is a perceived need for increased financial reporting regulations and to what extent this and other alternative means might improve market functioning. While both subject groups believed that a majority of firms only adopt a conservative one‐way disclosure strategy and the existence of a communication gap, analysts perceived a much higher need than CFOs for increased financial reporting regulations. Neither group thought that enhancing disclosure requirements alone would suffice to close this gap. Instead, they suggested an improvement in the quality of the communication and disclosure processes through means such as choosing more appropriate communication media, formulating a more proactive disclosure strategy, enhancing investor relationship, and voluntarily reporting more information desired by users.