Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: Strengths and limitations

David L. DeMets

Statistics in Medicine · 1987 · 1.1K citations · 37 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Combining data from multiple studies is common, yet no method adequately specifies which studies should be pooled, making this a major methodological limitation that requires careful consideration. The authors aim to establish basic design criteria that enable multicentre and multicountry trials to be more easily combined, requiring substantial scientific input on study selection. The authors identify that the lack of clear criteria for selecting studies to combine is the most serious methodological limitation.

Abstract

Methods for combining data from several studies exist and appear to be quite useful. None satisfactorily addresses the question of what studies should be combined. This issue is the most serious methodological limitation. Even studies with statistically significant interaction might still be combined if the effect were in the same direction. Thus, substantial scientific input is required as to what criteria must be met by each potential study. Much can be learned from combining or pooling data but it must be done cautiously. Pooling exercises do not replace well designed prospective clinical trials. Efforts for establishing basic design criteria to allow for multicentre and multicountry trials to be more easily combined might be useful.

References

37