Publication | Closed Access
A Prospective Comparison of Two Regimens of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Abdominal Trauma
49
Citations
0
References
1984
Year
SurgeryDrug ResistanceProphylactic AntibioticsAntimicrobial StewardshipTriple-drug RegimeSepsisVisceral TraumaInfection ControlAcute Kidney InjuryAntimicrobial ResistanceTrauma SurgeryAntibioticsPatient SafetyProspective ComparisonAbdominal TraumaRandomized Prospective StudyRemote Site InfectionsMedicinePostoperative ConsiderationEmergency Medicine
To determine the best antibiotic regimen to employ in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma, a randomized prospective study was designed comparing cefoxitin alone with a triple-drug regime of an aminoglycoside, ampicillin, and clindamycin. One hundred nineteen consecutive patients sustaining abdominal trauma (97 penetrating; 22 blunt) were divided by date of admission to a 24-hour course of antibiotics. The overall infection rate was 16.0%, with 14.5% of the cefoxitin-treated patients, and 18.0% of the triple-drug-treated patients developing an infectious complication. Excluding remote site infections, the abdominal wound and intraperitoneal infection rates were 13.0% for cefoxitin-treated patients, and 12.0% for triple-drug-treated patients. There was one instance of oliguric renal failure questionably related to an aminoglycoside. It is concluded that a 24-hour course of cefoxitin is a safe and effective prophylactic antibiotic regime in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma.