Critical Sociology · 2004 · 84 citations · 9 references
HumanitiesCultural StudiesMusicologyEthnomusicologyFestival StudiesMusic SociologyFestival MusicFestival PerformanceFestive PerformanceMusic AudiencesMusic-based SubculturesPopular MusicCarnival EthnographyCarnival Performance HistoryConcert CultureConcert RitualsCultural AlienationEthnographic SamplingFestive Music PerformanceLiminality In Carnival
This four‑year fieldwork examines transgressive, mainstream‑appearing shock‑music acts such as Eminem, Marilyn Manson, and Slipknot. The study offers an empirical, ethnographic critique of consumer society, framing shock music carnival as a proto‑utopian counter‑culture. Using Bakhtin’s carnival‑grotesque, the authors delineate the multi‑faceted symbolic qualities of shock music carnival as a liminal medium that asserts human‑equalizing realism. Ethnographic evidence shows that shock music carnival attracts a diverse fan base, challenges prior views of heavy‑metal alienation, and demonstrates that the spectacle functions both as domination and as resistance, offering fans a “second life” to escape and critique global capitalism.
This paper is based on a four-year concert fieldwork study of some of the most transgressive, shocking, and otherwise explicitly carnivalesque bands increasingly making it into the mainstream (e.g., Eminem, Marilyn Manson, Limp Bizkit, Slipknot, Cradle of Filth, Insane Clown Posse, GWAR, and Mindless Self Indulgence). The dis-alienating attractions of this music for an increasingly heterogeneous fan base are described in rich ethnographic detail, challenging Arnett's earlier work on heavy metal and adolescent alienation. The multi-faceted carnivalesque qualities and symbolic significances of shock music carnival are delineated in a lengthy application of Bakhtin's carnival-grotesque, a festive liminal medium for asserting and expressing human-equalizing realism. The general significance of the paper, as extensions of Kellner and Ritzer's works, is a demonstration of how shock music carnival is not simply spectacle as domination (or the commodification of dissent), but also spectacle as resistance (or a `time outside time' or `second life' in which fans escape and resist a disenchanted and duplicitous world of commercialization, and express everyday rage from living in a “nothing” world of global capital). This paper contributes to cultural Marxism by providing an empirical and ethnographic account of a proto-utopian critique of consumer society.
9
The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure
Michaël Gilsenan, Victor Turner · RAIN · 1976 · 6.8K citations
Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance
Steven Spitzer · Social Problems · 1975 · 452 citations