Can the National Innovation Systems of the New EU Member States Be Improved?The authors acknowledge financial support from the EU 6th Framework Programme (project CIT5- CT-028519,<i>U-Know),</i>the Estonian Ministry of Education (target funding T0107) and the Estonian Science Foundation (grant 5840).

Urmas Varblane, David A. Dyker, Dorel Tamm, Nick von Tunzelmann

Post-Communist Economies · 2007 · 42 citations · 31 references

Concepts

Abstract

This article outlines the main directions of the development of national innovation systems in the new EU member states as catch-up economies emerging from a period of systemic change. Attempts simply to copy the experience of the high-income economies in building national innovation systems are misconceived. That experience needs to be adapted to the specific conditions of catch-up countries with a unique systemic heritage. The dominant linear innovation model should be replaced as a basis for thinking and policy making by an interactive, learning-based approach. Catch-up economies such as these need to improve significantly their levels of innovation diffusion management and networking. A symbiotic approach to the balance of high- and low-tech industries is needed. Managerial and organisational competence is at least as important as technological competence.

References

31