Nuclear structure of the stable even-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>calcium isotopes based on new experiments and shell model calculations

K.‐H. Speidel, S. Schielke, O. Kenn, J. Leske, D. Hohn, H. Hodde, J. Gerber, P. Maier‐Komor, O. Zell, Y. Y. Sharon,

Physical Review C · 2003 · 17 citations · 12 references

Concepts

Abstract

In view of the striking implications of the recently measured $g$ factors for the ${2}_{1}^{+}$ states of $^{42}\mathrm{Ca}$ and $^{44}\mathrm{Ca}$ we have supplemented this study with similar measurements on $^{46}\mathrm{Ca}$. For all three isotopes we utilized the powerful technique of projectile Coulomb excitation in inverse kinematics combined with transient magnetic fields. In contrast to the positive $g({2}_{1}^{+})$ factor values for both $^{42,44}\mathrm{Ca}$, implying large admixtures of particle-hole configurations from $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}$ core excitations, the $g$ factor of $^{46}\mathrm{Ca}({2}_{1}^{+}),g=\ensuremath{-}0.19(12)$, is negative. This result is in very definite disagreement with the large positive value predicted by the large scale shell model (LSSM) calculations which included $sd$ shell core excitations into the $fp$ shell and accounted well for corresponding $^{42,44}\mathrm{Ca}$ results. The $B(E2;{0}_{1}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{2}_{1}^{+})$ deduced from the remeasured $^{46}\mathrm{Ca}({2}_{1}^{+})$ lifetime is indeed substantially smaller than the corresponding value for $^{42}\mathrm{Ca}$, again contrary to LSSM predictions. Both $g({2}_{1}^{+})$ and $B(E2)$ in $^{46}\mathrm{Ca}$ can be explained by full $fp$ shell model calculations using the FPD6 interaction without invoking core excitations.

References

12