Infection Control · 2004 · 37 citations · 20 references
Life SciencesMicrobiologyPharmacotherapyAntimicrobial ResistanceBacteriologyMedical MicrobiologyAntibacterial ResistanceAntibiotic ResistanceAntimicrobial Resistance ControlMolecular Epidemiology Of ResistanceResistance EpidemiologyResistance SurveillanceCohort Study InvestigationHospital Antimicrobial UtilizationMolecular Typing Of BacteriaMolecular Typing Of IsolatesMolecular Typing Of PathogensMolecular Typing Of Resistant IsolatesPseudomonas Aeruginosa ResistancePulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis Typing
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the emergence of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species to imipenem, ciprofloxacin, or both after the use of these drugs and to compare resistant with susceptible isolates by molecular typing. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Burn intensive care unit (ICU) with 4 beds in a tertiary-care university hospital. METHODS: During 16 months, surveillance cultures were performed for all patients admitted to the ICU. Demographic information was obtained for each patient. Molecular typing was done by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using restriction enzymes for 71 isolates of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were admitted and 22 were colonized by susceptible P. aeruginosa or Acinetobacter species before they used the antimicrobials. Nine (41%) of these patients had a resistant isolate after antimicrobial use: 5 had used imipenem alone, 1 had used ciprofloxacin, and 3 had used both drugs. The interval between isolation of the susceptible and resistant isolates ranged from 4 to 25 days, but was 10 or more days for 6 patients. Molecular typing revealed that susceptible and resistant isolates from each patient were different and that although there were no predominant clones among susceptible isolates, there was a predominant clone among resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa and of Acinetobacter. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance was not due to the acquisition of resistance mechanisms by a previously susceptible strain, but rather to cross-transmission. Although various measures involving antimicrobial use have received great attention, it would seem that practices to prevent cross-transmission are more important in controlling resistance.
20
William A. Knaus, Elizabeth A. Draper, Douglas P. Wagner et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 1985 · 13.7K citations
Medicine, Internal Medicine, Clinical Classification Systems +16
The estimation of areas of burns
Cc Lund · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1944 · 567 citations
Medicine, Surgery, Burn Surgery +8
Yehuda Carmeli, Nicolas Troillet, George M. Eliopoulos et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 1999 · 538 citations · Full text