Middle turbinate preservation versus middle turbinate resection in endoscopic surgical treatment of nasal polyposis

Abstract

In total, 56 patients were selected and all were observed over a 3-year follow-up period. We identified two groups: group A, 34 patients (60.71%) affected by nasal polyposis who underwent endoscopic surgery with the conservation of middle turbinate; group B, 22 patients (39.29%) affected by nasal polyposis who underwent more radical endoscopic sinus surgery. Analyzing the entire study group, during the 3-year follow-up, 20 (35.71%) of the 56 patients had a relapse of nasal polyposis. Analyzing time to relapse curves in the allergic and non-allergic patients, we obtained a p value of 0.0589, i.e. at the limit of statistical significance. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative Cologne test in the whole study group was statistically significant for a symptomatic improvement (p < 0.001). Trends within the two groups were also evaluated: there was a statistically significant difference in behavior upon time to relapse of the patients in group B vs group A (p = 0.0102). The patients in group A developed nasal recurrence more frequently during the follow-up periods. In patients affected by allergy vs patients not affected by allergy in group A, a statistically significant difference was noted (p = 0.0074); the allergic patients developed nasal recurrence more frequently during the follow-up period. We could not find a statistically significant difference between those patients affected by allergy and those not affected by allergy, as regards the number of relapses in patients in group B.