The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and worlds apart The views expressed in<i>Work &amp; Stress</i>Commentaries are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent those of any other person or organization, or of the journal.

TLDR

Kristensen et al. critique the Maslach Burnout Inventory and propose a more general burnout instrument focused exclusively on exhaustion. The authors critically examine the rationale and theoretical foundations behind the new burnout measure.

Abstract

Abstract In this edition of Work & Stress, Kristensen and his colleagues critically discuss the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and present an alternative, more general instrument to measure burnout that exclusively focuses on exhaustion. Here we critically examine their reasons for developing a new burnout measure, as well as the theoretical foundations of this measure. Whereas we agree with Kristensen et al.'s remarks concerning the availability and item wording of the MBI, we do not share their concerns regarding its theoretical underpinnings. In our view, burnout should be conceptualized as a primarily work-related syndrome of (at least) exhaustion and depersonalization/cynicism. The MBI would seem to fit that conceptualization very well.