American Antiquity · 1998 · 33 citations · 36 references
Language StudiesHistoryLinguisticsComparative LinguisticsHistorical LinguisticsLinguistic AnthropologyAreal LinguisticsHistorical DialectologyIndigenous LanguagesLanguage ChangeMiddle Eastern LinguisticsReconstruction Of Proto-languagesDialect ReconstructionEthnic Community HistoryGeographic DialectsHomeland ReconstructionLanguage Change In DialectsLanguage In DiasporaRegional Varieties Of SpanishSpeech Community Variation
Proto‑Tepiman speakers likely resided in the northern Hohokam region during the first millennium A.D., as indicated by linguistic contact with Proto‑River Yuman and geographic proximity to the Gila‑Colorado confluence. The study shows that by the fourteenth century the Hohokam system was multi‑ethnic, including Zuni speakers, and that Proto‑Tepiman exhibits greatest internal diversity in its northernmost varieties, with a reconstructed word for saguaro cactus indicating a northern distribution.
The Proto-Tepiman speech community—that is, the community that spoke the language ancestral to all the contemporary Tepiman languages—can be located at the northern end of the present-day Tepiman range, perhaps as far north and west as the Gila-Colorado confluence, and probably within the Hohokam region, during the Hohokam time period in the first millennium A.D. Evidence for the northern location of Proto-Tepiman includes, first, attestation of language contact with Proto-River Yuman, including data from phonology, syntax, and lexicon. This evidence suggests that the Hohokam were a multi-ethnic community; we present evidence that by the fourteenth century this multi-ethnic system probably included speakers of Zuni. Second, the greatest internal diversity in Tepiman is among the northernmost varieties. Third, we can reconstruct a word meaning “saguaro cactus,” a plant not found south of Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, for Proto-Tepiman. While the linguistic evidence strongly suggests the involvement of the Proto-Tepiman speech community in the Hohokam system, the evidence provided by contemporary Upper Piman languages (Akimel O’odham [Pima] and Tohono O’odham [Papago]) neither confirms nor excludes the involvement of speakers of these languages in the core Hohokam complex in the late prehistoric period.
36
Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics
Terrence Kaufman · Lingua · 1990 · 1.5K citations
International Journal of American Linguistics
C. F. Voegelin · Anthropology News · 1964 · 614 citations · Full text
Handbook of American Indian Languages
Franz Boas · The Mississippi Valley Historical Review · 1924 · 585 citations · Full text
Language Culture and Society · 2019 · 217 citations