Biotechnology and Bioengineering · 1998 · 500 citations · 27 references
Life SciencesBioengineeringBiological EngineeringBiological Systems ModelingBiological Transport PhenomenaMicrobial EcologyBacterial BiofilmsBiofilm FormationMicrobial BiofilmsMicrobial GrowthBiofilm ArchitectureBiofilm DynamicsBiofilm GrowthBiofilm Surface PropertiesBiofilm-substrate InteractionsFractal DimensionMass Transport LimitationSubstrate-limited Growth
The study evaluates quantitative two‑ and three‑dimensional biofilm models by introducing statistical measures to characterize both surface and volume structure. The authors investigate how biomass growth relative to diffusive substrate transport influences biofilm structure. Using a hybrid differential‑discrete model, the authors show that surface complexity metrics (enlargement, roughness, fractal dimension) rise with transport limitation while volume metrics (compactness, solids hold‑up) fall, producing porous biofilms under substrate‑limited conditions and compact, dense biofilms when growth is limited. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
A hybrid differential-discrete mathematical model has been used to simulate biofilm structures (surface shape, roughness, porosity) as a result of microbial growth in different environmental conditions. In this study, quantitative two- and three-dimensional models were evaluated by introducing statistical measures to characterize the complete biofilm structure, both the surface structure and volume structure. The surface enlargement, coefficient of roughness, fractal dimension of surface, biofilm compactness, and solids hold-up were found to be good measures of biofilm structure complexity. Among many possible factors affecting the biofilm structure, the influence of biomass growth in relation to the diffusive substrate transport was investigated. Porous biofilms, with many channels and voids between the "finger-like" or "mushroom" outgrowth, were obtained in a substrate-transport-limited regime. Conversely, compact and dense biofilms occurred in systems limited by the biomass growth rate and not by the substrate transfer rate. The surface complexity measures (enlargement, roughness, fractal dimension) all increased with increased transport limitation, whereas the volume measures (compactness, solid hold-up) decreased, showing the change from a compact and dense to a highly porous and open biofilm. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:101–116, 1998.
27
The Fractal Geometry of Nature
Benoît B. Mandelbrot, Paul Longley · 1982 · 5.5K citations
Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata
Stephen Wolfram · 1986 · 1.7K citations
Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport
Dirk de Beer, Paul Stoodley, Frank Roe et al. · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · 1994 · 866 citations
Generic modelling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies
Eshel Ben‐Jacob, Ofer Schochet, Adam Tenenbaum et al. · Nature · 1994 · 608 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Microbiology +16