Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels

Robert A. Fox, Ewa Jacewicz

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009 · 218 citations · 34 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study seeks to characterize dynamic spectral changes of vowels across three American English dialects: Western North Carolina, Central Ohio, and Southern Wisconsin. The authors recorded 1920 utterances of five vowels (/ɪ, ε, e, æ, aɪ/) produced by 48 women in /bVts/ and /bVdz/ contexts, measuring vowel target parameters such as F1–F2 position and movement, duration, vector length, trajectory length, and spectral rate of change. Results show that vowel emphasis and consonantal context affect formant dynamics, but dialect is a stronger source of variation, with dialect‑specific spectral change best captured by F1–F2 position/movement, duration, trajectory length, and spectral rate of change rather than vector length.

Abstract

This study aims to characterize the nature of the dynamic spectral change in vowels in three distinct regional varieties of American English spoken in the Western North Carolina, in Central Ohio, and in Southern Wisconsin. The vowels /ɪ, ε, e, æ, aɪ/ were produced by 48 women for a total of 1920 utterances and were contained in words of the structure /bVts/ and /bVdz/ in sentences which elicited nonemphatic and emphatic vowels. Measurements made at the vowel target (i.e., the central 60% of the vowel) produced a set of acoustic parameters which included position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, amount of spectral change [measured as vector length (VL) and trajectory length (TL)], and spectral rate of change. Results revealed expected variation in formant dynamics as a function of phonetic factors (vowel emphasis and consonantal context). However, for each vowel and for each measure employed, dialect was a strong source of variation in vowel-inherent spectral change. In general, the dialect-specific nature and amount of spectral change can be characterized quite effectively by position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, TL (but not VL which underestimates formant movement), and spectral rate of change.

References

34