International Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013 · 44 citations · 25 references
EducationKinesiologySports MedicineExercise PhysiologyMovement AnalysisPhysical ActivityAnkle BiomechanicsAnkle Range Of MotionBiomechanics Of Athletic MovementGait AnalysisGait BiomechanicsRunning BiomechanicsBarefoot GaitBarefoot Running MechanicsCompetitive AthletesFoot Strike PatternsFootwear BiomechanicsHuman Motion AnalysisRunning Foot Strike PatternsShod Running Mechanics
To investigate the effect of a transition program of simulated barefoot running (SBR) on running kinematics and foot-strike patterns, female recreational athletes (n=9, age 29 ± 3 yrs) without SBR experience gradually increased running distance in Vibram FiveFingers SBR footwear over 12 weeks. Matched controls (n=10, age 30 ± 4 yrs) continued running in standard footwear. A 3-D motion analysis of treadmill running at 12 km/h(-1) was performed by both groups, barefoot and shod, pre- and post-intervention. Post-intervention data indicated a more-forefoot strike pattern in the SBR group compared to controls; both running barefoot (P>0.05), and shod (P<0.001). When assessed barefoot, there were significant kinematic differences across time in the SBR group for ankle flexion angle at toe-off (P<0.01). When assessed shod, significant kinematic changes occurred across time, for ankle flexion angles at foot-strike (P<0.001) and toe-off (P<0.01), and for range of motion (ROM) in the absorptive phase of stance (P<0.01). A knee effect was recorded in the SBR group for flexion ROM in the absorptive phase of stance (P<0.05). No significant changes occurred in controls. Therefore, a 12-week transition program in SBR could assist athletes seeking a more-forefoot strike pattern and "barefoot" kinematics, regardless of preferred footwear.
25
Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners
Daniel E. Lieberman, Madhusudhan Venkadesan, William A. Werbel et al. · Nature · 2010 · 1.4K citations