Strategic Management Journal · 2005 · 842 citations · 62 references
ManagementMarketingStrategic ManagementCompetitive AdvantageDynamic CapabilitiesMarketing StrategyCapability DevelopmentFirm CapabilitiesOrganizational CapabilitiesResource ComplementarityResource LeveragingStrategic ResourcesInteraction Effect AnalysisKnowledge ComplementarityMain EffectsMarketing CapabilitiesMarketing ComplementarityResource SynergiesSynergistic ImpactsTechnology Complementarity
The dynamic capabilities perspective suggests firms can enhance performance by configuring, complementing, and integrating existing resources, yet empirical evidence on these mechanisms remains scarce. The study examines how marketing and technological capabilities, individually and jointly, affect firm performance and whether these effects differ under low versus high technological turbulence. The authors employ structural equation modeling two‑group analyses with control variables to test these relationships. The results show that marketing and technology capabilities each positively influence performance in both low and high turbulence, but their interaction is significant only under high turbulence, where marketing’s effect is weaker, indicating that complementary capabilities can yield performance gains only in specific environmental contexts. © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The dynamic capabilities perspective posits that a firm can leverage the performance impact of existing resources through resource configuration, complementarity, and integration, but little empirical research addresses these issues. We investigate the effects on performance of marketing capabilities, technological capabilities, and their complementarity (interaction), and whether these effects are moderated by low vs. high technological turbulence. Results from SEM two-group analyses (with controls) show that both main effects positively impact performance in both environmental contexts. However, (1) their interaction effect is significant only in the high-turbulence environment; (2) the marketing-related main effect is lower in the high-turbulence environment; and (3) the main effects of technology-related capabilities are the same in both environments. Our research suggests that the synergistic performance impact of complementary capabilities can be substantive in particular environmental contexts: while synergistic rents cannot always be obtained, it is possible to leverage existing resources through complementarity. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
62
Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 1994 · 46.5K citations
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Jay B. Barney · Journal of Management · 1991 · 45.6K citations
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management
David J. Teece, Gary P. Pisano, Amy Shuen · Strategic Management Journal · 1997 · 31.5K citations
A resource‐based view of the firm
Birger Wernerfelt · Strategic Management Journal · 1984 · 24.8K citations · Full text
J. Scott Armstrong, David M. Georgoff · International Journal of Forecasting · 1988 · 18.2K citations