A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of nortriptyline for chronic low back pain

Hampton J. Atkinson, Mark A. Slater, Rebecca Williams, Sidney Zisook, Thomas L. Patterson, Igor Grant, Dennis R. Wahlgren, Ian Abramson, Steven R. Garfin

Pain · 1998 · 183 citations · 48 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study aimed to evaluate whether nortriptyline reduces pain in men with chronic low back pain without depression in an 8‑week randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trial. Participants received either placebo or nortriptyline titrated to 50‑150 ng/ml, and outcomes included pain, disability, quality of life, mood, and physician‑rated global impression over 8 weeks. Nortriptyline produced a modest but statistically significant 22% greater reduction in pain intensity versus 9% with placebo (difference 1.68, p=0.05), with marginal improvement in disability and no significant changes in quality of life, mood, or physician ratings, and better analgesia in radicular pain subgroups, indicating noradrenergic mechanisms may contribute to back‑pain analgesia but benefits must be weighed against risks.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, as an analgesic in chronic back pain without depression, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial in 78 men recruited from primary care and general orthopedic settings, who had chronic low back pain (pain at T-6 or below on a daily basis for 6 months or longer). Of these 57 completed the trial; of the 21 who did not complete, four were withdrawn because of adverse effects. The intervention consisted of inert placebo or nortriptyline titrated to within the therapeutic range for treating major depression (50-150 ng/ml). The main outcome endpoints were pain (Descriptor Differential Scale), disability (Sickness Impact Profile), health-related quality of life (Quality of Well-Being Scale), mood (Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety/Depression Rating Scales), and physician rated outcome (Clinical Global Impression). Reduction in pain intensity scores was significantly greater for participants randomized to nortriptyline (difference in mean change 1.68, 95%-0.001, CI -3.36, P = 0.050), with a reduction of pain by 22% compared to 9% on placebo. Reduction in disability marginally favored nortriptyline (P = 0.055), but health-related quality of life, mood, and physician ratings of overall outcome did not differ significantly between treatments. Subgroup analyses of study completers supported the intent-to-treat analysis. Also, completers with radicular pain on nortriptyline (n = 5) had significantly (P < 0.05) better analgesia and overall outcome than did those on placebo (n = 6). The results suggest noradrenergic mechanisms are relevant to analgesia in back pain. This modest reduction in pain intensity suggests that physicians should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of nortriptyline in chronic back pain without depression.

References

48