Publication | Closed Access
Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation.
233
Citations
23
References
1996
Year
Tobacco CessationSubstance UseBehavioral AddictionRelapse PreventionRoc CurveTobacco ControlCritical TestNicotineAddiction MedicinePublic HealthHealth SciencesBehavioral SciencesTobacco UseCalifornia Tobacco SurveysAddiction PsychologySmoking CessationSubstance AbuseAddiction Versus StagesAddiction
Prospective data from the California Tobacco Surveys (n = 2066) were used to perform a critical test of the Prochaska et al. (1991) stages of change model. When the stages of change model was used as a stand alone predictor, smokers in preparation at baseline were more likely to be in cessation at follow-up than smokers in pre-contemplation at baseline (ORadj = 1.9). When stage membership was combined with baseline measures of addiction including smoking behaviors and quitting history, it was not a significant predictor of future cessation. A prediction equation that combined daily vs. occasional smoking, cigarettes per day smoked, life-time quits of at least a year, and quits of more than 5 days in the previous year discriminated smokers in cessation at follow-up of 1 to 2 years better than did the stages of change model. The area under the ROC curve for the equation based on addiction measures was 69.3% vs. 55.1% for the stages of change. Cessation rates ranged from 7.7% to 35.7% for the four-category addiction equation compared with 15.1% to 24.9% for stages of change model.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1