Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2012 · 1.2K citations · 22 references
Natural SciencesComputer ScienceMathematicsAlgorithmsInformation TheoryOptimizationConvex AnalysisConvex OptimizationDigital Signal ProcessingNonlinear ProgrammingRobust OptimizationSignal ProcessingAdditive NoiseCompressive SensingMinimizationPhase InformationPhase RetrievalSemidefinite ProgrammingSignal ReconstructionSparse Reconstruction
Abstract Suppose we wish to recover a signal \input amssym $\font\abc=cmmib10\def\bi#1{\hbox{\abc#1}} {\bi x} \in {\Bbb C}^n$ from m intensity measurements of the form $\font\abc=cmmib10\def\bi#1{\hbox{\abc#1}} |\langle \bi x,\bi z_i \rangle|^2$ , $i = 1, 2, \ldots, m$ ; that is, from data in which phase information is missing. We prove that if the vectors $\font\abc=cmmib10\def\bi#1{\hbox{\abc#1}}{\bi z}_i$ are sampled independently and uniformly at random on the unit sphere, then the signal x can be recovered exactly (up to a global phase factor) by solving a convenient semidefinite program–‐a trace‐norm minimization problem; this holds with large probability provided that m is on the order of $n {\log n}$ , and without any assumption about the signal whatsoever. This novel result demonstrates that in some instances, the combinatorial phase retrieval problem can be solved by convex programming techniques. Finally, we also prove that our methodology is robust vis‐à‐vis additive noise. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
22
Emmanuel J. Candès, Yaniv Plan · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2010 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing
Yi-Kai Liu, Steven T. Flammia, Stephen Becker et al. · Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 1.1K citations · Full text