Ecosphere · 2013 · 40 citations · 45 references
Life SciencesConservation BiologyEcologyConservation PlanningEcological RestorationRestoration EcologyCoastal Habitat ConservationCoastal Habitat RestorationEstuariesRestoration Success EvaluationWetland ConservationWetland RestorationCoastal Wetland RestorationPriority Setting For RestorationSediment AvailabilityTidal Marsh EcosystemsTidal Marsh RestorationTidal Wetland ConservationTidal Wetland RestorationWetland Restoration Planning
The large uncertainty surrounding the future effects of sea‐level rise and other aspects of climate change on tidal marsh ecosystems exacerbates the difficulty in planning effective conservation and restoration actions. We addressed these difficulties in the context of large‐scale wetland restoration activities underway in the San Francisco Estuary (Suisun, San Pablo and San Francisco Bays). We used a boosted regression tree approach to project the future distribution and abundance of five marsh bird species (through 2110) in response to changes in habitat availability and suitability as a result of projected sea‐level rise, salinity, and sediment availability in the Estuary. To bracket the uncertainty, we considered four future scenarios based on two sediment availability scenarios (high or low), which varied regionally, and two rates of sea‐level rise (0.52 or 1.65 m/100 yr). We evaluated three approaches for using model results to inform the selection of potential restoration projects: (1) Use current conditions only to prioritize restoration. (2) Use a single future scenario (among the four referred to above) in combination with current conditions to select priority restoration projects. (3) Combine current conditions with all four future scenarios, while incorporating uncertainty among future scenarios into the selection of restoration projects. We found that simply using current conditions resulted in the poorest performing restoration projects selected in terms of providing habitat for tidal marsh birds in light of possible future scenarios. The most robust method for selecting restoration projects, the “combined” strategy, used projections from all future scenarios with a discounting of areas with high levels of variability among future scenarios. We show that uncertainty about future conditions can be incorporated in site prioritization algorithms and should motivate the selection of adaptation measures that are robust to uncertain future conditions. These results and data have been made available via an interactive decision support tool at www.prbo.org/sfbayslr .
45
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
A working guide to boosted regression trees
Jane Elith, John R. Leathwick, Trevor Hastie · Journal of Animal Ecology · 2008 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Computing, Biostatistics, Ecology +14
The art of modelling range-shifting species
Jane Elith, Michael Kearney, Steven Phillips · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · 2010 · 2.8K citations