Publication | Closed Access
Empirical tight-binding calculation of dispersion in the second-order nonlinear optical constant for zinc-blende crystals
103
Citations
27
References
1987
Year
Categoryquantum ElectronicsOptical MaterialsEngineeringNonlinear OpticsDispersionElectronic StructureZinc-blende CrystalsSemiconductorsIi-vi SemiconductorOptical PropertiesQuantum MaterialsZinc-blende Materials GapOptical SpectroscopyMaterials SciencePhysicsCrystal MaterialNon-linear OpticNonlinear CrystalsEmpirical Tight-binding CalculationSemiconductor MaterialQuantum ChemistrySolid-state PhysicZero-frequency ValuesMomentum Matrix ElementsNatural SciencesOptical PhysicCondensed Matter PhysicsApplied Physics
We calculate both the finite- and zero-frequency values of \ensuremath{\chi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow} $^{(2)}$ for the zinc-blende materials GaP, GaAs, GaSb, InAs, and InSb, by employing an empirical tight-binding band-structure technique, used previously to obtain the dispersion in the linear-optical properties. The momentum matrix elements are calculated by three methods: by using k\ensuremath{\cdot}p perturbation theory together with the experimental effective masses, by direct calculation using wave functions from a more fundamental theory, and by fitting ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{1}$(0) to experiment. The calculated conduction-band--conduction-band (c-c) momentum matrix elements were found to be approximately an order of magnitude smaller than the experimental matrix elements, while the valence-band--conduction-band (v-c) matrix elements agreed much better. When the experimental c-c matrix elements are used, good agreement is found between theory and experiment for \ensuremath{\chi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow} $^{(2)}$ for all materials except InAs and InSb in the low-frequency region. For these latter materials, the discrepancy is accounted for by inadequacies in the empirical tight-binding band structure. It is proposed that Fong and Shen's [Phys. Rev. B 12, 2325 (1975)] anomalously low results for \ensuremath{\chi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow} $^{(2)}$(0) could be due to calculated values for the c-c (or v-c) momentum matrix elements which are too small.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1