Study abroad as ‘adventure’: globalist construction of host–home hierarchy and governed adventurer subjects

Neriko Musha Doerr

Critical Discourse Studies · 2012 · 67 citations · 29 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Globalist discourse frames study abroad as a means of cultivating global citizens, contrasting a technologically omnipresent home society with a parochial host society that is accessed only through immersion. The article investigates how adventure discourse in study‑abroad advertising constructs a host–home hierarchy and positions students as subjects, offering a critical analysis of this globalizing project beyond imperial reproductions. Using text analysis of two U.S. guidebooks, the study shows adventure rhetoric portrays the host as isolated, unknown.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the discourse of adventure, prevalent in study-abroad advertisements, constructs hierarchical relations between the study-abroad students' host and home societies and interpellates the students as subjects. Through text analysis of two US-based guidebooks on study abroad, this article shows how the discourse of adventure constructs the host society as isolated, unknown, and behind the times, with an unsound educational system, and the students' home society as always accessible and up to date, with a sound education system. Through its intersection with valorization of immersion and ideologies of outcome-based education, the discourse also interpellates the students as ‘adventurers’ and governs their desires regarding how to learn (through exploration) and what to gain (‘global competence’). This article offers critical analyses of the little-examined globalizing project of study abroad and its effects that go beyond mere reproduction of imperial travels. Keywords: globalismdiscoursestudy abroadconstruction of subjectsconstruction of hierarchyadventureimmersionlearningtravel writingtext analysis Notes Variations notwithstanding, ‘global citizens’ are commonly defined as those who understand the interconnectedness of the world, engage in issues of global significance, and relate to those from other cultures (Deardorff, Citation2009). I have argued elsewhere (Doerr, 2010, 2012a) that the valorization of ‘immersion’ for study-abroad students creates a contrast between a home society that is omnipresent thanks to globalizing technologies and a parochial host society that supposedly is accessible only through immersion. In this article, I focus on the discourse of adventure and the notion of time.

References

29