Emergency Medicine Journal · 2007 · 66 citations · 14 references
MedicineCardiologyEmergency MedicineElectrophysiologyEmergencyPatient SafetyCardiac EmergenciesCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiogenic ShockCardiovascular MonitoringElectrocardiogram AnalysisElectrocardiographyArrhythmia DetectionArrhythmia DiagnosisCardiac Monitoring After Electrical InjuryElectrical Injury Severity AssessmentElectrocardiogram DiagnosisHigh-voltage Electrical InjuryManagement Of High-risk Patients
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience monitoring patients with previously identified theoretical risk factors of significant electrical injury. METHODS: Patients who presented to one of 21 emergency departments between October 2000 and November 2004 were eligible to be enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study if after an electric shock they had one of several risk factors (transthoracic current, tetany, loss of consciousness or voltage source > or =1000 V) and therefore needed cardiac monitoring. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients enrolled, most were monitored because of transthoracic current (n = 60), transthoracic current and tetany (n = 39), tetany (n = 10), or voltage > or =1000 V (n = 10). There were 15/134 (11%) patients with abnormal initial ECGs. No patient developed potentially lethal late arrhythmia during the 24 hours of cardiac monitoring. CONCLUSION: Although only patients deemed at risk of late arrhythmias were monitored, none developed potentially lethal late arrhythmias. Asymptomatic patients with transthoracic current and/or tetany and a normal initial ECG do not require cardiac monitoring after an electrical injury with voltage <1000 V and no loss of consciousness.
14
Electrical injury causing ventricular arrhythmias.
Perry Jensen, Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen, J. P. Bagger et al. · Heart · 1987 · 131 citations · Full text
Pediatric electrical burns: management strategies
Muhammad Zubair, Gail E. Besner · Burns · 1997 · 89 citations
Medicine, Child Health, Pediatrics +14