Statistics and Computing · 2014 · 173 citations · 60 references
ComputingComputer ScienceData ScienceData MiningMachine LearningStatistical ModelingBayesian ComputationBayesian InferenceBayesian Model BuildingBayesian StatisticsMarkov Chain Monte CarloBayesian ClusteringFinite Mixture ModelsGaussian Mixture ModelsGibbs SamplingHierarchical Shrinkage PriorsMixture ModelSparse ModelsSparsity Priors
The study proposes a joint Bayesian approach to simultaneously estimate the number of Gaussian mixture components and identify cluster‑relevant variables while achieving model identification. The method employs sparse hierarchical priors on mixture weights and component means, overfits the mixture to empty redundant components during MCMC, estimates the true component count from the most frequent non‑empty component number, and relabels MCMC output via Mahalanobis‑distance centroid clustering, with inference performed by Gibbs sampling and data augmentation. Using a normal‑gamma shrinkage prior on component means improves parameter estimation and aids identification of cluster‑relevant variables.
In the framework of Bayesian model-based clustering based on a finite mixture of Gaussian distributions, we present a joint approach to estimate the number of mixture components and identify cluster-relevant variables simultaneously as well as to obtain an identified model. Our approach consists in specifying sparse hierarchical priors on the mixture weights and component means. In a deliberately overfitting mixture model the sparse prior on the weights empties superfluous components during MCMC. A straightforward estimator for the true number of components is given by the most frequent number of non-empty components visited during MCMC sampling. Specifying a shrinkage prior, namely the normal gamma prior, on the component means leads to improved parameter estimates as well as identification of cluster-relevant variables. After estimating the mixture model using MCMC methods based on data augmentation and Gibbs sampling, an identified model is obtained by relabeling the MCMC output in the point process representation of the draws. This is performed using [Formula: see text]-centroids cluster analysis based on the Mahalanobis distance. We evaluate our proposed strategy in a simulation setup with artificial data and by applying it to benchmark data sets.
60
THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS
Ronald Aylmer Fisher · Annals of Eugenics · 1936 · 14.7K citations · Full text
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
Choice Reviews Online · 1991 · 10.6K citations
Trevor Park, George Casella · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2008 · 3K citations
Model-Based Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Clustering
Jeffrey D. Banfield, Adrian E. Raftery · Biometrics · 1993 · 2.4K citations