Medical Physics · 2009 · 43 citations · 21 references
MedicineBiomedical EngineeringRadiologyRadiation DetectionRadiation DosimetryRadiation MeasurementAbsorbed DosePatient-specific DosimetryPhantom DosimetryRadiation Dose MeasurementRadiation TherapyX-ray DetectionDetector Spatial ResolutionMetal-oxide-semiconductor Field-effect Transistor DosimetryMicrobeam DosimetryMicrodosimetryMicroscale DosimetryPhantom-based Dose MeasurementSpatial Resolution MeasurementX-ray Dosimetry
Various dosimeters have been tested for assessing absorbed doses with microscopic spatial resolution in targets irradiated by high-flux, synchrotron-generated, low-energy (approximately 30-300 keV) x-ray microbeams. A MOSFET detector has been used for this study since its radio sensitive element, which is extraordinarily narrow (approximately 1 microm), suits the main applications of interest, microbeam radiation biology and microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). In MRT, micrometer-wide, centimeter-high, and vertically oriented swaths of tissue are irradiated by arrays of rectangular x-ray microbeams produced by a multislit collimator (MSC). We used MOSFETs to measure the dose distribution, produced by arrays of x-ray microbeams shaped by two different MSCs, in a tissue-equivalent phantom. Doses were measured near the center of the arrays and maximum/minimum (peak/valley) dose ratios (PVDRs) were calculated to determine how variations in heights and in widths of the microbeams influenced this for the therapy, potentially important parameter. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the absorbed dose distribution in the phantom were also performed. The results show that when the heights of the irradiated swaths were below those applicable to clinical therapy (< 1 mm) the MC simulations produce estimates of PVDRs that are up to a factor of 3 higher than the measured values. For arrays of higher microbeams (i.e., 25 microm x 1 cm instead of 25 x 500 microm2), this difference between measured and simulated PVDRs becomes less than 50%. Closer agreement was observed between the measured and simulated PVDRs for the Tecomet MSC (current collimator design) than for the Archer MSC. Sources of discrepancies between measured and simulated doses are discussed, of which the energy dependent response of the MOSFET was shown to be among the most important.
21
AAPM protocol for 40–300 kV x‐ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology
Chao Ma, C Coffey, L DeWerd et al. · Medical Physics · 2001 · 819 citations · Full text
Dosimetric Precision Requirements in Radiation Therapy
Anders Brahme · Acta Radiologica Oncology · 1984 · 521 citations
Presta: The parameter reduced electron-step transport algorithm for electron monte carlo transport
Alex F. Bielajew, D. W. O. Rogers · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · 1986 · 450 citations
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
Andrew Holmes‐Siedle · Nuclear Instruments and Methods · 1974 · 199 citations