Allergy · 2006 · 75 citations · 19 references
MedicineInternal MedicineHealth AssessmentPsychometricsPulmonologyAsthma ManagementPulmonary Function AssessmentAsthma DiagnosisAsthma Severity AssessmentAsthma Severity ClassificationClinical Score EvaluationConstruct ValidityInternal Consistency ReliabilityScreening QuestionnairesTest-retest Reliability
BACKGROUND: We developed an instrument for quantifying asthma control, the Asthma Control Scoring System (ACSS), based on the criteria proposed by the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To assess the measurement properties of the ACSS. METHODS: The ACSS and two other questionnaires were completed by 44 asthmatic patients on a first visit and 2 weeks later. The ACSS evaluates three types of parameters: clinical, physiologic, and inflammatory. These parameters are each quantified to obtain a maximal score of 100% and a global score is calculated as the mean of these scores. RESULTS: The analysis showed sufficient internal consistency for every section of the ACSS (Cronbach's-alpha ranging from 0.72 to 0.88). Pearson's correlations indicated good test-retest reliability for the clinical score (r = 0.59, P = 0.005), the physiologic score (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001), the inflammatory score (r = 0.71, P = 0.049), and the global score (r = 0.65, P = 0.001). Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity were supported by moderate correlations between the ACSS scores and corresponding instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The ACSS is a valid tool for quantifying asthma control parameters, using a percent score. Further research should determine the usefulness of such an instrument as a means to improve asthma management and reduce related morbidity.
19
Standardization of Spirometry—1987 Update
American Review of Respiratory Disease · 1987 · 2.3K citations
Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial
Ruth H. Green, Christopher E. Brightling, Susan McKenna et al. · The Lancet · 2002 · 1.8K citations