Retina · 2000 · 173 citations · 0 references
Health ProfessionsOphthalmologyVision ScienceOcular DiseaseOcular ImagingOphthalmic SurgeryMacular DiseaseMacular DisordersMacular ImagingOptical Coherence TomographyRetinal ExaminationRetinal PathologyEpiretinal Membrane ImagingFluorescein Angiography FindingsMacular Disease AssessmentMacular Hole ImagingMacular Optical Coherence TomographyMacular Traction SyndromeVitreomacular Traction SyndromeVitreous Adhesion
PURPOSE: To compare the relative incidence of vitreoretinal adhesions associated with partial vitreous separation within the macula diagnosed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) with that of those diagnosed with biomicroscopy. METHODS: The authors obtained linear cross-sectional retinal images using OCT in patients with selected macular diseases. Additional studies included biomicroscopy, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and B-scan ultrasonography. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography was performed on 132 eyes of 119 patients. Vitreoretinal adhesions within the macula were identified using OCT in 39 eyes (30%) with the following diagnoses: idiopathic epiretinal membrane (n = 13), diabetic retinopathy (n = 7), idiopathic macular hole (n = 7), cystoid macular edema (n = 7), and vitreomacular traction syndrome (n = 5). Biomicroscopy identified vitreoretinal adhesions in only 11 eyes (8%). Two distinct vitreoretinal adhesion patterns were identified with OCT, each associated with partial separation of the posterior hyaloid face: focal (n = 25) and multifocal (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography is more sensitive than biomicroscopy in identifying vitreoretinal adhesions associated with macular disease.