World Journal of Surgery · 2006 · 22 citations · 25 references
MedicineMedical EducationSurgeryGeneral SurgeryResidency TrainingSurgical InstrumentationAbdominal SurgeryAppendiceal SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgerySurgery EducationSurgical ResidencyLaparoscopic AppendectomyLaparoscopic ResectionSurgical Training
BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in surgical training is unclear. Although LA as a therapeutic modality is potentially superior to open surgery, it has failed to become established as standard in training hospitals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of LA performed by inexperienced surgeons in a training environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all attempted LA performed over a 12-month period was undertaken. Data collected included operator grade (experienced and inexperienced), conversion rate and duration of surgery, complications, and postoperative stay. RESULTS: During the study period, 169 appendectomies were performed. The conversion rate to open surgery declined significantly from 28% in the first quarter to 9% in the last quarter, with no difference in the conversion rate between experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Operative time shortened significantly in the inexperienced group. Postoperative complications occurred in 8% of patients, independent of operative grade. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that LA may be safely introduced as a teaching procedure. Time-to-train should not preclude institutions from adopting the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
25
A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
SE Attwood, Arnold Hill, Patricia Gillivan Murphy et al. · PubMed · 1992 · 288 citations
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
Enric Macarulla, J. Vallet, Josep Maria Haro Abad et al. · PubMed · 1997 · 218 citations