New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 71 citations · 4 references
Health ProfessionsHealth LawHealth PolicyHealth Care LawHealth Care RegulationHealth Information PrivacyData ProtectionPatient PrivacyPrivacy LawPrivacy PolicyPrivacy ProtectionProtected Health InformationConfidentiality Of Medical RecordsConstitutional ObjectionsHealth Insurance Portability And Accountability Act Privacy RuleHealthcare PrivacyMedical ConfidentialityMedical Record PrivacyPatient Privacy PolicyPrivacy Standards
Americans value both medical record privacy and research, yet the HIPAA‑based regulations aimed at protecting privacy—though not intended to affect research—have sparked strong objections from biotech and academic medicine. The regulations have elicited strong objections from the biotechnology industry and academic medicine. No additional metadata or code links are provided.
Americans support both protecting the privacy of medical records and encouraging medical research. Thus, it is not surprising that a move to change practices in these two areas has generated attention and comment. The new federal regulations, promulgated under the authority of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), were adopted to protect the privacy of medical records. They were not specifically designed to facilitate or limit medical research.1 Nonetheless, the regulations have prompted strong objections from the biotechnology industry and from academic medicine. The Association of American Medical Colleges and the Biotechnology Industry Organization have argued . . .
4
Confidentiality in Medicine — A Decrepit Concept
Mark Siegler · New England Journal of Medicine · 1982 · 265 citations
Law, Health Law, Psychiatry +17
The Threat to Medical-Records Research
L. Joseph Melton · New England Journal of Medicine · 1997 · 247 citations
Reforming Informed Consent to Genetic Research
George J. Annas · JAMA · 2001 · 57 citations