Publication | Closed Access
Experimental Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled RC Frames
493
Citations
15
References
1996
Year
Geotechnical EngineeringEarthquake EngineeringEngineeringExperimental EvaluationMasonry StructuresFoundation EngineeringMechanical EngineeringCivil EngineeringReinforced ConcreteMasonry Infill PanelsInfill PanelsStructural ApplicationStructural PerformanceStructural SystemLoad-bearing CapacityStructural MechanicsConstruction EngineeringStructural Engineering
The study investigates how masonry infill panels affect the seismic performance of code‑designed reinforced concrete frames. The authors tested twelve half‑scale single‑story single‑bay RC frames—one wind‑load‑designed and one earthquake‑designed—varying infill panel strength, aspect ratio, vertical load distribution, and lateral‑load history. Experimental results show that masonry infill panels markedly enhance RC frame performance, with strong‑frame/strong‑panel combinations yielding the best load resistance and energy dissipation, and all infilled specimens generating higher lateral loads than bare frames, even at low drift levels.
The influence of masonry infill panels on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) frames that were designed in accordance with current code provisions are investigated. Two types of frames are considered. One was designed for wind loads and the other for strong eqrthquake forces. Twelve 1/2-scale, single-story, single-bay, frame specimens were tested. The parameters investigated included the strength of infill panels with respect to that of the bounding frame, the panel aspect ratio, the distribution of vertical loads, and the lateral-load history. The experimental results indicate that infill panels can significantly improve the performance of RC frames. However, specimens with strong frames and strong panels exhibited a better performance than those with weak frames and weak panels in terms of the load resistance and energy-dissipation capability. The lateral loads developed by the infilled frame specimens were always higher than that of the bare frame. This is even true for the least ductile specimen deforming up to a drift level of 2%.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1