The Journal of Urology · 2005 · 39 citations · 12 references
MedicineRadiologyUrologyDiagnostic RadiologyHistologyUrolithiasisCystine StonesStone PathologyStone VisualizationCystine Stone FormationImaging Of Cystine StonesRenal CalculiRenal Stone FormationRenal Stone ImagingStone MorphologyStone StructureUreteral Stone Imaging
PURPOSE: The classification of cystine stones into rough and smooth varieties has been suggested as an aid to choosing treatment for these difficult stones. Since the surface of stones is difficult to visualize preoperatively, we tested the hypothesis that the surface morphology of cystine stones correlates with their internal structure, as viewed by helical computerized tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystine stones were examined visually and categorized into rough (15 stones) and smooth (16 stones) subpopulations of similar size. Each stone was scanned in a helical CT scanner (GE Quad Scanner) to assess radiological characteristics and to measure attenuation values. Scans were also performed using a microCT 20 high resolution laboratory scanner (Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) at 34 microm voxel size and the percent of internal voids was determined. RESULTS: Mean helical CT attenuation values +/- SD for rough stones were lower than for smooth stones (702 +/- 206 vs 921 +/- 51 HU, p <0.002) and the radiological appearance of rough stones suggested radiolucent voids. Internal voids in rough stones were confirmed using micro CT. Rough cystine stones contained a higher percent of internal voids (0.30% vs 0.06%, p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rough cystine stones can be distinguished from smooth stones using helical CT in vitro, suggesting that it may be possible to distinguish these stones preoperatively. Since rough cystine stones have been reported to be susceptible to shock wave lithotripsy, the identification of this morphology of cystine stones in the patient using attenuation values and appearance on helical CT could be valuable for planning treatment.
12
Four Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Image Quality and Volume Coverage Speed
Hui Hu, Hairong He, W. Dennis Foley et al. · Radiology · 2000 · 511 citations
Stone Fragility—A New Therapeutic Distinction
Stephen P. Dretler · The Journal of Urology · 1988 · 258 citations
K. C. SAW, James A. McAteer, Ashish G. Monga et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 2000 · 198 citations
Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy
James C. Williams, K. C. SAW, Ryan F. Paterson et al. · Urology · 2003 · 137 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Urology +12