Anaesthesia · 2006 · 31 citations · 15 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryBiomedical Signal ProcessingCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyBlood Pressure Signal AnalysisCardiac Signal ProcessingCardiovascular AssessmentCardiovascular MonitoringHemodynamicsPostoperative Cardiac MonitoringArterial Blood Pressure Waveform AnalysisArterial Pressure-based MonitoringCardiac OutputCardiovascular Monitoring After SurgeryContinuous Arterial Pressure MonitoringHemodynamic MonitoringInvasive Cardiac MonitoringPerioperative Cardiovascular Monitoring
This study was performed to determine the interchangeability of femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure measurements as the input for the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). We studied 15 intensive care patients following cardiac surgery. Five-second averages of the cardiac output derived from the femoral artery pressure (COfem) were compared to 5-s averages derived from the radial artery pressure (COrad). One patient was excluded due to problems in the pattern recognition of the arterial pressure signal. In the remaining 14 patients, 14 734 comparative cardiac output values were analysed. The mean sample time was 88 min, range [30-119 min]. Mean (SD) COfem was 6.24 (1.1) l.min(-1) and mean COrad 6.23 (1.1) l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed an excellent agreement with a bias of - 0.01 l.min(-1), and limits of agreement from 0.60 to - 0.62 l.min(-1). If changes in CO were > 0.5 l.min(-1), the direction of changes in COfem and COrad were equal in 97% of instances. We conclude that femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure are interchangeable as inputs for the PiCCO device.
15
A H BECKETT, M ROWLAND, P TURNER · The Lancet · 1965 · 16.9K citations
Continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour during cardiac surgery
J. R. C. Jansen, Karel H. Wesseling, Jos J. Settels et al. · European Heart Journal · 1990 · 193 citations
Medicine, Anesthesiology, Surgery +15