The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 1970 · 46 citations · 6 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologyAcousticsHearing AssessmentRisk AssessmentAuditory ThresholdsNoiseNoise ExposureNoise-induced Hearing DamageOccupational Noise ExposureTemporary Threshold ShiftAuditory Threshold Shift RecoveryDamage CriteriaHigh-frequency Threshold ShiftIntermittent Noise ExposureNoise-induced Temporary Threshold ShiftNoise-induced Threshold ShiftRecovery From Temporary Threshold ShiftSensitivity
The study proposes modifying the CHABA damage‑risk criteria by replacing TTS2 with higher‑threshold metrics such as TTS30 or TTS1000 to better reflect the harmfulness of different exposure patterns. The authors exposed 12 normal‑hearing students for up to 8 h to steady and intermittent noises designed to elicit TTS2 values within CHABA limits, and discuss alternative DRCs under consideration. The experiments showed that while short bursts met the TTS2 limits, longer bursts exceeded them due to inaccurate recovery assumptions, and that high‑frequency, high‑energy.
Twelve normal-hearing students were exposed for up to 8 h to steady and intermittent noises that, according to the CHABA damage-risk criteria (DRC) proposed in 1966, should produce an average TTS2 (temporary threshold shift measured 2 min after exposure) no greater than 10 dB at 1 kHz or below, 15 dB at 2 kHz, or 20 dB at 3 kHz or above. This objective appears to have been attained for single uninterrupted exposures and for intermittent exposures involving short (below 3–5 min) noise bursts and recovery periods. However, the cited limits of TTS2 tend to be exceeded when the noise bursts are quite long (10 min or more), owing to an erroneous previous assumption about the course of recovery during the quieter intervals between successive bursts. Modification of the DRC is therefore indicated. However, a more vexing finding is that intermittent exposures to high-frequency high-energy noise—either long bursts or short—often produce a delayed recovery; that is, more than 16 h of rest is required to restore the initial sensitivity. Thus, in an industrial situation, some workers in such a noise may in essence have a chronic TTS. In case such a chronic auditory fatigue may lead to permanent damage, extreme caution should be exercised in exposing men to levels above 100 dB in the 1500-Hz range or higher, even when the ratio of noise duration to pause duration is quite small. It is proposed that limiting values of TTS30 or TTS1000 rather than TTS2 might be more valid indicators of relative noxiousness of various exposure patterns. Alternate DRC presently under consideration are also discussed.
6