IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2012 · 84 citations · 17 references
EngineeringComputer EngineeringElectrical EngineeringComputer NetworksOptoelectronicsPhotonicsInterconnect ArchitectureMesh NetworksNetwork Performance AnalysisNetwork-on-chip DesignOptical Communication SystemsOptical InterconnectsAnalytical ModelsCrosstalkCrosstalk AnalysisOptical Network-on-chipOptical NetworkingPerformance DegradationPerformance Degradation ModelingSignal-to-noise Ratio
Crosstalk noise is an intrinsic characteristic as well as a potential issue of photonic devices. In large scale optical networks-on-chips (ONoCs), crosstalk noise could cause severe performance degradation and prevent ONoC from communicating properly. The novel contribution of this paper is the systematical modeling and analysis of the crosstalk noise and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of optical routers and mesh-based ONoCs using a formal method. Formal analytical models for the worst-case crosstalk noise and minimum SNR in mesh-based ONoCs are presented. The crosstalk analysis is performed at device, router, and network levels. A general 5 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$\,\times\,$</tex></formula> 5 optical router model is proposed for router level analysis. The minimum SNR optical link candidates, which constrain the scalability of mesh-based ONoCs, are identified. It is also shown that symmetric mesh-based ONoCs have the best SNR performance. The presented formal analyses can be easily applied to other optical routers and mesh-based ONoCs. Finally, we present case studies of mesh-based ONoCs using the optimized crossbar and Crux optical routers to evaluate the proposed formal method. We find that crosstalk noise can significantly limit the scalability of mesh-based ONoCs. For example, when the mesh-based ONoC size, using optimized crossbar, is larger than 8 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$\,\times\,$</tex></formula> 8, the optical signal power is smaller than the crosstalk noise power; when the network size is 16 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$\,\times\,$</tex> </formula> 16 and the input power is 0 dBm, in the worst-case, the signal power is <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">${-}{\rm 24.9}~{\rm dBm}$</tex></formula> and the crosstalk noise power is <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">${-}{\rm 11}~{\rm dBm}$</tex></formula> .
17
William J. Dally, Brian Towles · 2001 · 3.2K citations
Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering +17
Ultracompact optical buffers on a silicon chip
Fengnian Xia, L. Šekarić, Yurii A. Vlasov · Nature Photonics · 2006 · 1.1K citations
Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering +14
Nanoelectronic and Nanophotonic Interconnect
R. G. Beausoleil, Philip J. Kuekes, Greg Snider et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2008 · 253 citations
Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering +15